I really enjoyed reading this book. All of her books in the Time series have been wonderful, so far as I have read.
1. If any haven't read the first 2 books, did you find any of the allusions to the first two books confusing, or were you able to stay with the story?
Having read the first 2 books, I didn't find the references to the first two books confusing. I also don't think that it would be confusing to someone who hasn't read them. They were there but you didn't need to know the stories to understand this one. It could stand as it's own.
2. How do you feel about the main premise of the book, Charles Wallace's search for the 'might have been', the one thing he could change in the past to completely alter the future?
I think it is totally possible to have one moment where you could venture down one path or another and completely change your future. Would it be cool to be able to go back and change something in the past, definitely, but I would have to be rock bottom bad to do that. I'd be afraid to do that now, I really like my life and the choices I made led me here, so I wouldn't want to change anything.
3. Anybody else have questions? My head is still stuffed up and I can't think.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
PS, Lisa, I think we should do an open call for whomever wants to host. I know I will need a couple months 'off' for my move. Anybody up for February?